Gumloop is a no-code platform for visual AI automations, agents, and connected business workflows.
Editorial score
Visual builder with 100+ pre-built nodes and integrations.
Credit consumption can vary with model choice, tokens, tools, and task length.
Gumloop is a no-code platform for visual AI automations and agents. Its drag-and-drop builder, agent tools, scheduling, webhooks, APIs, MCP connectivity, and operational controls make it a strong option for business teams that want to automate work without relying solely on developers.
Gumloop is a no-code platform for building visual automations and AI agents. Teams connect nodes on a drag-and-drop canvas, bring together business applications, APIs, webhooks, and MCP tools, then run work through schedules, events, webhooks, or APIs. Its agents receive goals and tools and can select tools adaptively rather than following only fixed workflow steps.
Gumloop supports node-based workflows with schedules, webhooks, service events, and agent triggers. Builders can use routing, looping, batch processing, reusable subflows, checkpoints, and run history. Error Shield adds separate success and error paths while retaining failed-item inputs for retry and fallback patterns. REST endpoints and a Python SDK also let technical teams start workflows and retrieve outputs programmatically.
Gumloop combines 100+ prebuilt nodes and integrations with connectors such as Gmail, Slack, GitHub, Salesforce, Airtable, HubSpot, Linear, Jira, Google Calendar, and Notion. Webhooks, REST APIs, and the Python SDK extend execution options. MCP-compatible servers can extend agents and workflows, but custom servers need publicly accessible HTTPS endpoints and cannot use localhost or stdio connections.
Gumloop fits business and operations teams that want nontechnical employees to build AI-enabled workflows for CRM, lead generation, meeting preparation, SEO, support, analytics, and campaign work. Larger organizations can evaluate Enterprise controls such as RBAC, SCIM/SAML, audit logs, data retention rules, model access controls, VPCs, and workflow queuing. Buyers with high-volume workloads should validate concurrency and credit usage on representative tasks, and teams requiring private or local MCP connectivity should test compatibility first.
Where the product fits — and where to be careful
Recommended for business-led AI automation with operational oversight.
Potentially strong fit when Enterprise controls and MCP network requirements align with policy.
Gumloop combines a 100+ node and integration surface with schedules, webhooks, service and agent triggers, routing, loops, subflows, batch execution, error paths, retries, checkpoints, logs, REST execution, and a Python SDK.
Agents work from goals and tools, can adaptively select tools, chain in workflows, run in batches, and use AI model, tool-call, data-enrichment, web-scraping, and MCP nodes.
The platform offers 100+ pre-built nodes and integrations, named business connectors, webhook and REST API execution, a Python SDK, and MCP support for extending agents and workflows.
Free and Pro pricing are public, with a Free plan at 5,000 monthly credits and Pro starting at $37 per month. Buyers should model credit consumption and concurrency needs because usage and capacity limits affect operating cost.
Category scores use the linked comparison rubric and can differ from a product’s overall review score.
| Product | Category score | Best for | Key tradeoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 4.5/5 | No-code business and operations users building AI-powered workflows for research, document handling, and connected browser or business-app tasks. | Credit consumption can vary with model choice, tokens, tools, and task length. |
| | 4.8/5 | Technical teams and AI builders that need highly customizable, self-hosted automations with code-level control. | Self-hosting leaves the buyer responsible for hosting, security, upgrades, and reliability. |
| | 4.0/5 | Businesses that need fast, accessible AI automation across a vast app integration ecosystem. | Task-based billing, AI model multipliers, tool calls and overages can raise costs for high-volume workflows. |
| | 3.8/5 | Professionals and teams that want an AI assistant for communication and scheduling plus customizable automation for repeatable business tasks. | Credit consumption varies by model, complexity, premium actions, and run duration; unused credits do not roll over. |
Based on 17 public customer reviews. Source mix: 7 from g2.com, 6 from producthunt.com, 2 from capterra.com, and 2 from getapp.com.
Customer sentiment is analyzed separately and does not determine the Reviews.vc editorial score.
| Theme and finding | Mentions | Positive | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|
Workflow building Buyers find the no-code builder flexible and powerful for automating varied operational work, though complex flows can be difficult to troubleshoot initially. | 13 | 12 | 1 |
Ease of use The interface and workflow nodes are widely viewed as intuitive and easier than competing automation tools, although some users struggle with complex tasks or initial overwhelm. | 11 | 10 | 1 |
Integrations Users value connections to tools such as Slack, Google, Zendesk, Notion, and OAuth-enabled services, while one reviewer wants a broader integration catalog. | 8 | 8 | 1 |
Onboarding Setup is often described as straightforward with tutorials, community resources, and support, but the breadth of options and AI learning curve can create early choice paralysis. | 6 | 5 | 3 |
AI capabilities AI-native agents, nodes, and data-processing capabilities enable more sophisticated automations, but agent reliability and feedback can be a challenge for complex tasks. | 5 | 4 | 1 |
Mentions count unique reviews. One review can count as both positive and negative for the same theme when it describes a mixed experience.
This analysis reflects public customer reviews we could identify and access at the time of collection; the displayed source mix may influence the patterns shown.
| Period | n | Positive | Mixed | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2Limited sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 Q3Limited sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 Q4Limited sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 Q1Limited sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Only periods containing dated reviews are shown; gaps between labels mean no dated reviews were available for those periods.
Gumloop offers Free and Pro plans with public pricing and a custom-priced Enterprise option. Usage is credit-based; annual billing is advertised at 20% off and a 14-day trial is available.
| Plan | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
Free | $0 per month | Includes 5,000 credits per month, one seat, one active trigger, two concurrent runs, five concurrent agent interactions, unlimited agents, and unlimited flows. |
Pro | Starts at $37 per month | Includes 20,000+ credits per month, unlimited seats, five concurrent runs, 25 concurrent agent interactions, unlimited teams, and hosting for one MCP server. |
Documented connections and access methods for Gumloop.
Recent product and company updates
Version 10.14.0 release
Gumloop listed version 10.14.0 in its official changelog.
Source$50 million Series B
Gumloop announced a $50 million Series B led by Benchmark, with participation from Nexus VP, First Round Capital, Y Combinator, Box Group, The Cannon Project, and Shopify Ventures.
SourceApollo.io partnership and native integration
Gumloop announced a partnership with Apollo.io and a direct native integration.
SourceShowing 10 of 22 sources · 12 additional sources analyzed
Rate Gumloop